Correlated UCS values from PLI


It is a general practice to carryout Point load test for 2-3 specimens retreived from Pile bores and convert to UCS and evaluate the socketing depths with other criterias, such as CR/RQD of adjacent boreholes, sample sizes, angularity/shape of samples, weathering conditions, rock condition and depths of adjacent piles etc. However as per the ASTM D 5731 to obtain accurate PLI values for lump samples at least 20 specimens shall be tested for a sample, and which is not possible/practicle with samples from bored piles. However it is understood testing 2-3 specimens are carried internationally and an accepted criteria and since it is not the sole parameter which determines the socketing the accurancy of the test results are not required to a manner it is requested to carry out as per ASTM D 5731. 

However I would like to know from any expert who dealt in this area, the reliability of UCS recieved from PLI test if we test only 1 specimen, 2 specimen or 3 specimen.

 

 

Rock Mechanics Construction Deep Foundations

1 Answer

Votes: 1

David Nutakor

Asoka,

Please note that the purpose of testing at least 20 samples is to be able to estimate the strength value using any available statistical tool. You cannot get a meaningful result when you try to determine the mean value or the standard deviation using results from only three samples. If you have a very limited samples to test, the best practice is to perform both PLI and UCS on a few samples and then develop a graph for the two tests (i.e., UCS vs PLI graph). Once this graph is plotted (hopefully, with a reasonable coefficient of correlation), you can easily determine corresponding UCS values of any PLI tests from the equation of the graph going forward. I have attached a plot of UCS versus PLI on a project that l was actively involved during 2004-2005 timeframe.